Forgot your password?

Green Clouds

treeAn article posted on the US site SoftwareAdvice  caught my eye today. What with world leaders meeting in New York to discuss climate change I thought it might be an opportune moment to look at the green credentials of web-based software and shamelessly re-work some of the numbers the original article highlighted.

Power Consumption

Let’s first look at power usage.

A typical multi-user, on-premise solution (ie, the old-fashioned stuff that comes in a CD in a box) would use:

1 x Server(7,000 KW/year) +
4 x High Spec Desktop PCs (400 KW/year each) =
A total of 8,600 KW per year.

A web-based solution like our online accounting software uses multiple servers. A Dell PowerEdge 2950 server, Rackspaces most popular server, uses 6,700 KW per year per server. So 13,400 in total.

As most of the data processing and number crunching takes place on the servers, much lower powered computers can be used by the software user. A Dell notebook perhaps using 120KW/year.

So if one customer replaces their on-premise software with our web based solution then their power consumption would be:

2 x Server (6,700KW/year  each) +
4 x Low-power Laptops (120KW/year each x 4) =
A total of 13,880 KW / year

How web-based software wins

OK, the green argument isn’t looking great for web-based software right now.

But web-based applications, or “SaaS – Software as a Service” solutions, can serve lots and lots of customers without the need for additional servers (unless you follow Sage’s Stupid-as-a-Service strategy).

So let’s scale the numbers up to 10,000 organisations. A tiny number considering there are somewhere between 2m and 4.5m small businesses in the UK.

For on-premise software it’s an easy calculation: 8,600 x 10,000 = 86,000,000 KW / Year
For web-based software you take the 4 laptops (120KW x 4 = 480KW) and multiply that by the 10,000 organisations to get 4,800,000KW / year and then add the servers (6,700KW x 2) to get a grand total of 4,813,400 KW per year  

Average Reduction in CO2 Emissions per company 

That’s a whopping saving of 81,186,600 KW per year from just 10,000 organisations moving from locally installed software to web-based software. Or around 8,000KW per year per organisation.

1KW hour of electricity produces an average of 0.43kg of CO2 emissions (varying dependent on how the electricity is produced). So 8,000KW saved equals 3,440KG less carbon emissions per year per company that moves to web-based solutions

The National Energy Foundation says that a bus produces 1kg of CO2 per 10 miles that it travels.

So by moving just one organisation to web-based software saves the equivalent of:

- 34,400 miles of bus journey
- or 13,760 miles in an Aston Martin DB9
- or a couple of return flights from London to New York
- or a lot of cow farts

Other factors

These calculations are very much “back of a fag packet” and only cover power consumption. What they don’t take into account are the many other factors.

No oil-based CDs to produce, no packaging or manuals to produce and ship,  less need to replace hardware (a very old computer can comfortably use web-based software),  more tele-commuting (so less travelling).

No stamps, envelopes or paper used or miles travelled by postmen to deliver invoices or statements as they’re sent by email. Even when you really *have* to send a hardcopy of an invoice, web-based postal services like ViaPost that integrate with KashFlow can seriously reduce the CO2 footprint.

I’m pretty sure I’ve just saved the world from global warming. But please don’t give me the Nobel Prize, it should go to Tim Berners-Lee (can you beleive he doesn’t have one yet???)

But seriously folks…

Even though my numbers may not be highly scientific, I still think there’s a very big green argument to be made in favour of moving towards the web-based model of delivering software.

It’d be interesting to hear thoughts from others that might have a better grasp on the numbers

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Delicious]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to StumbleUpon] 

Tags: , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009 at 8:15 am and is filed under Cloud Computing / SaaS, Ramblings, Technology. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Green Clouds”

  1. “(a very old computer can comfortably use web-based software), ”

    Apart from the fact that older computers are usually more open to security flaws, as most struggle to run SP3, IE8 etc which increase security, especially in KashFlows case.

  2. @Matthew

    I don’t think it’s the computer that’s open to security flaws it’s the software.

    For those still running IE6, IE7 you could always run Google Chrome Frame http://blog.chromium.org/2009/09/introducing-google-chrome-frame.html and get rid of IE completely.

    If you don’t want to patch Windoze install a linux distro instead.

  3. Jay Greasley says:

    hmm, very much back of fag packet as you only mention the many other factors involved with the traditional model, not the many associated with running a large, hot data centre.
    Nice marketing as ever though ;-)

  4. Good article, However this does assume the client side decide to completely remove the infrastructure they use, even if they do decide to to move ALL software applications to the web (which currently isn’t possible in most industries).

    I think it is un realistic to expect many companies to get rid of the application server in their offices inexchange for a completely web based opperation.

    I do look forward to the day when all software is completely online but i think we’re a way off being able to rely on the internet for all of it and trusting BT to keep our internet connections up. And if they don’t what do we do if we have a 100 strong workforce and cant access the internet and therefore any of our information?

Leave a Reply


Sage’s hidden SaaS Accounting Gem » « Sage Head for the Cloud (again) – with CRM


Awards and stuff